Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 35th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $2.1M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc. · California · Other Services
$2M in assets, 1 participants
Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc.'s Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan reported $2M in total assets and 1 participant in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 35th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #4,835 in Other Services (8,398 peers)
Other Services sector rank
Within Other Services, Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan ranks #4,835 of 8,398 2022 filers by assets (946% of the sector average)-$2M for 1 participant.
- #4,835
- in Other Services (8,398 peers)
- +63.8%
- assets growth YoY
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Other Services and all filers
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,121,673 35th percentile higher than 35% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 824482915 · Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan · $2M · 1 · 35th
- EBSA $2M
- EBSA 1
- EBSA 35th
- EBSA Profit Sharing
- EBSA near Fishman Group, PC Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
- EBSA ind #4835
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Other Services retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Other Services filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $1M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | $827K |
| Employer EIN | 824482915 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2018-02-19 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Max, Kobi & Oliver's Doghouse Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- N/A
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | N/A | N/A |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Max, Kobi & Olivers Doghouse Inc. Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Fishman Group, PC Profit Sharing Plan and Trust in MI ($2M); by covered participants it is Luke Krumnow, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in TX (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.