Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
James Cw Moy Md Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 39th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.4M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by James Cw Moy Md · New York · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$3M in assets, 2 participants
James Cw Moy Md's James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan reported $3M in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 39th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #8,403 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
James Cw Moy Md multi-year trail
James Cw Moy Md's plans moved +59.0% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan at $3M / 2 participants.
- #8,403
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- -33.8%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $1M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,754,827 39th percentile higher than 39% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 132936924 · James Cw Moy Md PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan · $3M · 2 · 39th
- SCH $3M
- SCH 2
- SCH 39th
- SCH Profit Sharing
- SCH near Tri Lazy W Ranch Profit Sharing Plan
- SCH ind #8403
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in New York →
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
James Cw Moy Md multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All James Cw Moy Md plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $6M 58.95596049932562% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 4 | $4M |
| 2023 | 2 | 4 | $5M |
| 2024 | 2 | 4 | $6M |
James Cw Moy Md filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $4M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$1M |
| Employer EIN | 132936924 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1990-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in New York
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Annuity Plan of the Electrical Industry $2.0B · 19,997
- Annuity Fund Iuoe Local 15, 15a, 15c, 15d AFL-CIO $1.6B · 3,494
- Annuity Fd of the Iuoe Local Union 94, 94a, 94b AFL-CIO $1.5B · 5,696
- The Research Foundation for Suny Retirement Plan $1.1B · 11,139
- Mason Tenders District Council Annuity Fund $837M · 11,072
James Cw Moy-Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside New York, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Tri Lazy W Ranch Profit Sharing Plan in CO ($3M); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.