Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $34M
- Total assets Below avg plan size
- 22
- Participants Small participant base
- 84th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.5M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Hstp Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. · California · Professional & Technical Services
$34M in assets, 22 participants
Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C.'s Hstp Profit Sharing Plan reported $34M in total assets and 22 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 84th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #18,312 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Where Hstp Profit Sharing Plan sits by assets
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan sits in the top quartile of all filed plans by assets, $34M for 22 participants (~$1.5M/participant), up 18.9% in 2022.
- #18,312
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- +18.9%
- assets growth YoY
- 0.3×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan's outsized position by total assets
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$33,916,043 Top 16% higher than 84% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Hstp Profit Sharing Plan is a small filing (22 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 952588380 · Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan · $34M · 22 · 84th
- EBSA $34M
- PART 22
- TYPE 84th
- NET Profit Sharing
- BOOK near Alaskan Copper Companies, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
- VS-ST ind #18312
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $29M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $34M |
| Net Income | $5M |
| Employer EIN | 952588380 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1970-03-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $42M 24.61374105463895% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 22 | $34M |
| 2023 | 1 | 21 | $38M |
| 2024 | 1 | 22 | $42M |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Hstp Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Alaskan Copper Companies, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust in WA ($34M); by covered participants it is Home Health Care of Northern Virginia, Inc. Retirement Plan in VA (22 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($34M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (22 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.