Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Park Farming Organics Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 16
- Participants Small participant base
- 33rd
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $120,116
- Avg per participant Near avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan · Sponsored by Park Farming Organics · California · Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
$2M in assets, 16 participants
Park Farming Organics's Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan reported $2M in total assets and 16 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 33rd percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #537 in Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing (1,523 peers)
Park Farming Organics multi-year trail
Park Farming Organics's plans moved -16.7% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan at $2M / 16 participants.
- #537
- in Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing (1,523 peers)
- -13.8%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $308K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,921,856 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan is a small filing (16 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 854345190 · Park Farming Organics PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan · $2M · 16 · 33rd
- TYPE $2M
- TYPE 16
- TYPE 33rd
- TYPE Profit Sharing
- TYPE near Santa Fe Trail Senior Services Inc
- TYPE ind #537
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Park Farming Organics multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Park Farming Organics plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $2M 16.703488710912783% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 16 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | 14 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 18 | $2M |
Park Farming Organics filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $2M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$308K |
| Employer EIN | 854345190 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2008-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Park Farming Organics 401(k) Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Santa Fe Trail Senior Services Inc in CO ($2M); by covered participants it is Mincey Enterprises Inc. Retirement Plan in VA (16 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (16 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.