Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Ellen F Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 33rd
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.8M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Ellen F Driscoll · California · Professional & Technical Services
$2M in assets, 1 participants
Ellen F Driscoll's Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan reported $2M in total assets and 1 participant in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 33rd percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #6,282 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Ellen F Driscoll multi-year trail
Ellen F Driscoll's plans moved +20.3% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan at $2M / 1 participant.
- #6,282
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- -4.5%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $87K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,841,425 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 954617208 · Ellen F Driscoll PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan · $2M · 1 · 33rd
- EOY $2M
- EOY 1
- EOY 33rd
- EOY Profit Sharing
- EOY near Cg Resource Mgmt. Corp. Profit-Sharing Plan
- EOY ind #6282
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Ellen F Driscoll multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Ellen F Driscoll plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $2M 20.280326377669468% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | $2M |
Ellen F Driscoll filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $2M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$87K |
| Employer EIN | 954617208 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1996-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Ellen F. Driscoll Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Cg Resource Mgmt. Corp. Profit-Sharing Plan in IL ($2M); by covered participants it is Luke Krumnow, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in TX (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.