401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Rio Grande Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 234
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 43rd
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $14,468
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Rio Grande 401(k) Plan · Sponsored by Rio Grande Mexican Restaurants, Inc. · Colorado · Food Services & Accommodation
$3M in assets, 234 participants
Rio Grande Mexican Restaurants, Inc.'s Rio Grande 401(k) Plan reported $3M in total assets and 234 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 43rd percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #3,549 in Food Services & Accommodation (4,592 peers)
Food Services & Accommodation sector rank
Within Food Services & Accommodation, Rio Grande 401(k) Plan ranks #3,549 of 4,592 2022 filers by assets (578% of the sector average)-$3M for 234 participants.
- #3,549
- in Food Services & Accommodation (4,592 peers)
- -19.1%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $798K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Food Services & Accommodation and all filers
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$3,385,414 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Rio Grande 401(k) Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (234 participants).
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 841021343 · Rio Grande Mexican Restaurants, Inc. PY 2022 · 401(k)
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan · $3M · 234 · 43rd
- TYPE $3M
- NET 234
- BOOK 43rd
- VS-ST 401(k)
- BOY near Lecom Profit Sharing Plan
- SCH ind #3549
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Food Services & Accommodation retirement plans → · Plans in Colorado →
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Food Services & Accommodation filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $4M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$798K |
| Employer EIN | 841021343 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1999-11-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Colorado
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Davita Retirement Savings Plan $2.8B · 57,172
- Ball Corporation 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan $2.5B · 10,671
- Scl Health 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan $1.5B · 12,642
- Woodward Retirement Savings Plan $1.5B · 5,046
- Empower Retirement, LLC 401(k) Savings Plan $1.5B · 7,741
Rio Grande 401(k) Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Colorado, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Lecom Profit Sharing Plan in MI ($3M); by covered participants it is Lifecare, Inc. 401(k) Plan in CT (234 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
- Lecom Profit Sharing Plan (MI) $3M · 265
- Bay Area Tech Workers 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (CA) $3M · 108
- Advanced Digital Cable, Inc 401(k) Plan (NC) $3M · 160
- Nemo, Inc. Profit Sharing & 401(k) Plan (NH) $3M · 128
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (234 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- Lifecare, Inc. 401(k) Plan (CT) 234 · 0 off
- Bettermed Urgent Care 401(k) Retirement Plan (VA) 234 · 0 off
- S.W. Rodgers Co., Inc. 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan (VA) 234 · 0 off
- Bader Rutter Retirement Plan (WI) 234 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.