ESOP · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. ESOP
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $5M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 157
- Participants Small participant base
- 49th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $29,300
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan · Sponsored by Moscow Bancshares, Inc. · Tennessee · Finance & Insurance
$5M in assets, 157 participants
Moscow Bancshares, Inc.'s Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan reported $5M in total assets and 157 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 49th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #3,143 in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
Coverage in Tennessee
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan covers 157 participants in Tennessee, about 14% of the average Tennessee filer (state average ~1,126 per filing). Assets: $5M.
- #3,143
- in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
- +7.0%
- assets growth YoY
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Finance & Insurance and all filers
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$4,600,143 49th percentile higher than 49% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (157 participants).
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 621218198 · Moscow Bancshares, Inc. PY 2022 · ESOP
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan · $5M · 157 · 49th
- EBSA $5M
- EBSA 157
- EBSA 49th
- EBSA ESOP
- EBSA near Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc ESOP
- EBSA ind #3143
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with What is an ESOP? → · Plans in Tennessee →
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Tennessee filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $4M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $5M |
| Net Income | $299K |
| Employer EIN | 621218198 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2006-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Moscow Bancshares, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Moscow Bancshares, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $5M 12.086754694364936% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 157 | $5M |
| 2023 | 1 | 168 | $5M |
| 2024 | 1 | 175 | $5M |
Nearby ESOP Plans in Tennessee
Peer ESOP plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Barr Brands International Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan $449M · 312
- Zander Group Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $200M · 184
- 3ls, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $118M · 505
- Paladin Capital, Inc. ESOP $99M · 3,771
- Churchill Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $93M · 512
Moscow Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan's out-of-state ESOP peers by assets and headcount
Outside Tennessee, the nearest ESOP by assets is Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc ESOP in HI ($5M); by covered participants it is California Boiler, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in CA (157 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($5M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (157 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.