401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
R M Palmer Company 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $47M
- Total assets Below avg plan size
- 574
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 87th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $81,304
- Avg per participant Below avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan · Sponsored by R M Palmer Company · Pennsylvania · Manufacturing
$47M in assets, 574 participants
R M Palmer Company's R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan reported $47M in total assets and 574 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 87th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #16,802 in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
Where R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan sits by assets
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan sits in the top quartile of all filed plans by assets, $47M for 574 participants (~$81,304/participant), down 18.7% in 2022.
- #16,802
- in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
- -18.7%
- assets change YoY
- 0.5×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
The plan reported a net loss of $11M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan's outsized position by total assets
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$46,668,361 Top 13% higher than 87% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (574 participants).
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 232106938 · R M Palmer Company PY 2022 · 401(k)
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan · $47M · 574 · 87th
- EOY $47M
- EOY 574
- EOY 87th
- EOY 401(k)
- EOY near Sealaska Corporation 401(k) Plan
- EOY ind #16802
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Manufacturing retirement plans → · Plans in Pennsylvania →
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $57M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $47M |
| Net Income | -$11M |
| Employer EIN | 232106938 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1989-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Pennsylvania
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Comcast Corporation Retirement - Investment Plan $14.8B · 97,769
- Cigna 401(k) Plan $11.5B · 66,147
- The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan $8.1B · 59,451
- The Vanguard Retirement and Savings Plan $8.1B · 17,073
- The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan $7.8B · 25,071
R M Palmer Company Investment Opportunity Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Pennsylvania, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Sealaska Corporation 401(k) Plan in AK ($47M); by covered participants it is Stellar Industries, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in IA (574 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($47M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (574 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- Stellar Industries, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (IA) 574 · 0 off
- Optima Tax Relief, LLC 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (CA) 574 · 0 off
- Cohn Restaurant Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan (CA) 574 · 0 off
- Plum Market 401(k) Plan (MI) 574 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.