Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $5M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 12
- Participants Small participant base
- 49th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $382,286
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc · Massachusetts · Other Services
$5M in assets, 12 participants
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc's Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan reported $5M in total assets and 12 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 49th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #5,713 in Other Services (8,398 peers)
What the 2022 filing shows
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan holds $5M for 12 participants - about $382,286 per participant, in the lower half of filed plans by assets.
- #5,713
- in Other Services (8,398 peers)
- +4.4%
- assets growth YoY
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Other Services and all filers
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$4,587,434 49th percentile higher than 49% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan is a small filing (12 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 042194921 · Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan · $5M · 12 · 49th
- PART $5M
- PART 12
- PART 49th
- PART Profit Sharing
- PART near James H Brodsky Md PC Profit Sharing Plan
- PART ind #5713
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Other Services retirement plans → · Plans in Massachusetts →
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $4M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $5M |
| Net Income | $195K |
| Employer EIN | 042194921 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1966-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Massachusetts
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Consolidated 403(b) Program of Mass General Brigham and Member Organizations $12.1B · 74,556
- Demoulas (Restated) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust $873M · 12,106
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Retirement Plan $635M · 4,216
- The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. Employees' Profit Sharing Retirement Fund $573M · 5,008
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 17 Annuity Income Fund $540M · 2,153
Dello Russo Funeral Service Inc Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Massachusetts, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is James H Brodsky Md PC Profit Sharing Plan in MD ($5M); by covered participants it is Laurence-Hovenier, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in CA (12 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($5M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (12 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- Laurence-Hovenier, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (CA) 12 · 0 off
- Automated Services and Products, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (CA) 12 · 0 off
- Mechanix Wear, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (CA) 12 · 0 off
- George Kanter Pension Plan (NJ) 12 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.