Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Sixpac Inc Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $418K
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 17th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $418,093
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Sixpac Inc · Illinois · Finance & Insurance
$418K in assets, 1 participants
Sixpac Inc's Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan reported $418K in total assets and 1 participant in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 17th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #979 in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
2022 asset change
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan pulled back noticeably 11.1% in 2022 ($470K → $418K) for 1 participant.
- #979
- in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
- -11.1%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $52K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$418,093 17th percentile higher than 17% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 261139461 · Sixpac Inc PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · $418K · 1 · 17th
- PHOTO $418K
- IND 1
- EOY 17th
- 5500 Profit Sharing
- ASSETS near Nelson Ortiz Santiago Retirement Plan
- PCT ind #979
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Finance & Insurance retirement plans → · Plans in Illinois →
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Sixpac Inc years around the 2022 move
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Sixpac Inc plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $432K 3.3016577651383785% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $418K |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $428K |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | $432K |
2022 asset-move particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $470K |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $418K |
| Net Income | -$52K |
| Employer EIN | 261139461 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2007-10-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Illinois
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- W. W. Grainger, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan $3.0B · 17,181
- Electrical Contractors Assoc. of the City of Chgo Union 134, IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chgo Plan 5 $2.9B · 21,985
- Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company Profit Sharing Trust $2.5B · 4,327
- Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Supplemental Retirement Plan $1.4B · 16,140
- Accenture United States Discretionary Profit Sharing Plan $893M · 10,992
Sixpac Inc 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Illinois, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Nelson Ortiz Santiago Retirement Plan in PR ($418K); by covered participants it is Luke Krumnow, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in TX (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($418K here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.