ESOP · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Burke, Inc. ESOP
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $125M
- Total assets Near avg plan size
- 427
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 94th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $292,494
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan · Sponsored by Burke, Inc. · Ohio · Professional & Technical Services
$125M in assets, 427 participants
Burke, Inc.'s Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan reported $125M in total assets and 427 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 94th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #20,481 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Where Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan sits by assets
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan sits in the top 10% of all filed plans by assets, $125M for 427 participants (~$292,494/participant), up 2.6% in 2022.
- #20,481
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- +2.6%
- assets growth YoY
- 1.3×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan's outsized position by total assets
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$124,894,921 Top 6% higher than 94% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (427 participants).
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 311271870 · Burke, Inc. PY 2022 · ESOP
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan · $125M · 427 · 94th
- IND $125M
- EOY 427
- 5500 94th
- ASSETS ESOP
- PCT near Cts Cement Manufacturing Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
- EIN ind #20481
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with What is an ESOP? → · Plans in Ohio →
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $122M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $125M |
| Net Income | $3M |
| Employer EIN | 311271870 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2004-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Burke, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Burke, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $240M 11.7780502459823% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 765 | $215M |
| 2023 | 2 | 685 | $234M |
| 2024 | 2 | 654 | $240M |
Nearby ESOP Plans in Ohio
Peer ESOP plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust & Employee Stock Ownership Plan $22.0B · 30,782
- The Garland Industries, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust $1.4B · 1,000
- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $559M · 3,337
- Messer Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $557M · 808
- Cleveland Steel Container Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan $445M · 407
Burke, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan's out-of-state ESOP peers by assets and headcount
Outside Ohio, the nearest ESOP by assets is Cts Cement Manufacturing Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in CA ($125M); by covered participants it is Merchants Bancorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan in IN (427 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($125M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (427 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.