Defined Benefit (Pension) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Lear Corporation Pension Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $137M
- Total assets Near avg plan size
- 808
- Participants Near avg headcount
- 94th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $169,058
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Lear Combined Pension Plan · Sponsored by Lear Corporation · Michigan · Manufacturing
$137M in assets, 808 participants
Lear Corporation's Lear Combined Pension Plan reported $137M in total assets and 808 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 94th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #18,763 in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
Where Lear Combined Pension Plan sits by assets
Lear Combined Pension Plan sits in the top 10% of all filed plans by assets, $137M for 808 participants (~$169,058/participant), down 22.7% in 2022.
- #18,763
- in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
- -22.7%
- assets change YoY
- 1.4×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
The plan reported a net loss of $40M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Lear Combined Pension Plan's outsized position by total assets
Lear Combined Pension Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$136,598,513 Top 6% higher than 94% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Lear Combined Pension Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Lear Combined Pension Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (808 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 133386776 · Lear Corporation PY 2022 · Defined Benefit (Pension)
Lear Combined Pension Plan · $137M · 808 · 94th
- TYPE $137M
- NET 808
- BOOK 94th
- VS-ST Defined Benefit (Pension)
- BOY near Redstone Federal Credit Union Defined Benefit Plan
- SCH ind #18763
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Manufacturing retirement plans → · Plans in Michigan →
Lear Combined Pension Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $177M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $136M |
| Net Income | -$40M |
| Employer EIN | 133386776 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1989-06-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Lear Corporation)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Lear Corporation plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $1.7B 18.683312196308684% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 10,662 | $1.4B |
| 2023 | 4 | 10,011 | $1.6B |
| 2024 | 4 | 10,756 | $1.7B |
Nearby Defined Benefit (Pension) Plans in Michigan
Peer Defined Benefit (Pension) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan $40.2B · 18,766
- Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan $19.3B · 27,567
- Ford Motor Company General Retirement Plan $13.4B · 11,760
- Dow Employees' Pension Plan $13.0B · 13,759
- Fca US LLC UAW Pension Agreement $8.6B · 14,563
Lear Combined Pension Plan's out-of-state Defined Benefit (Pension) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Michigan, the nearest Defined Benefit (Pension) by assets is Redstone Federal Credit Union Defined Benefit Plan in AL ($137M); by covered participants it is Northwest Bricklayers Pension Plan in OR (807 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($137M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (808 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.