401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Nuclear Care Partners, LLC 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 907
- Participants Near avg headcount
- 39th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $3,101
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Nuclear Care Partners, LLC · Colorado · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$3M in assets, 907 participants
Nuclear Care Partners, LLC's Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan reported $3M in total assets and 907 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 39th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #8,510 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
Coverage in Colorado
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan covers 907 participants in Colorado, 2.4x the typical Colorado plan (state average ~376 per filing). Assets: $3M.
- #8,510
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- -1.9%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $54K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,812,253 39th percentile higher than 39% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (907 participants).
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 451564059 · Nuclear Care Partners, LLC PY 2022 · 401(k)
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan · $3M · 907 · 39th
- NET $3M
- NET 907
- NET 39th
- NET 401(k)
- NET near Beaton, Inc. 401(k) Plan
- NET ind #8510
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in Colorado →
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Colorado filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$54K |
| Employer EIN | 451564059 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2013-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Nuclear Care Partners, LLC)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Nuclear Care Partners, LLC plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $5M 67.98165029959965% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 907 | $3M |
| 2023 | 1 | 1,034 | $3M |
| 2024 | 1 | 1,236 | $5M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Colorado
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Davita Retirement Savings Plan $2.8B · 57,172
- Ball Corporation 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan $2.5B · 10,671
- Scl Health 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan $1.5B · 12,642
- Woodward Retirement Savings Plan $1.5B · 5,046
- Empower Retirement, LLC 401(k) Savings Plan $1.5B · 7,741
Nuclear Care Partners Retirement Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Colorado, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Beaton, Inc. 401(k) Plan in IA ($3M); by covered participants it is Thomas Cuisine Management 401(k) Plan in ID (907 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (907 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.