Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 38th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $2.7M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Metal Consultants Corp · California · Professional & Technical Services
$3M in assets, 1 participants
Metal Consultants Corp's Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan reported $3M in total assets and 1 participant in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 38th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #7,642 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
2022 asset change
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan contracted severely 34.6% in 2022 ($4M → $3M) for 1 participant.
- #7,642
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- -34.6%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $1M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Professional & Technical Services and all filers
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,680,852 38th percentile higher than 38% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 952470529 · Metal Consultants Corp PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan · $3M · 1 · 38th
- BOY $3M
- SCH 1
- EBSA 38th
- PART Profit Sharing
- TYPE near Getnick & Getnick LLP Profit Sharing Plan
- NET ind #7642
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Metal Consultants Corp years around the 2022 move
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Metal Consultants Corp plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- N/A
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $3M |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | N/A |
2022 asset-move particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $4M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$1M |
| Employer EIN | 952470529 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1974-10-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Metal Consultants Corp Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Getnick & Getnick LLP Profit Sharing Plan in NY ($3M); by covered participants it is Luke Krumnow, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in TX (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.