Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $12M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 195
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 69th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $63,728
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Moody Dunbar, Inc. · Tennessee · Manufacturing
$12M in assets, 195 participants
Moody Dunbar, Inc.'s Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan reported $12M in total assets and 195 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 69th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #11,860 in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
Coverage in Tennessee
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan covers 195 participants in Tennessee, about 17% of the average Tennessee filer (state average ~1,126 per filing). Assets: $12M.
- #11,860
- in Manufacturing (20,602 peers)
- -15.9%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $2M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's outsized position by total assets
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$12,426,891 Top 31% higher than 69% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (195 participants).
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 620629133 · Moody Dunbar, Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · $12M · 195 · 69th
- EOY $12M
- EOY 195
- EOY 69th
- EOY Profit Sharing
- EOY near Poten & Partners Group, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
- EOY ind #11860
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Manufacturing retirement plans → · Plans in Tennessee →
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Tennessee filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $15M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $12M |
| Net Income | -$2M |
| Employer EIN | 620629133 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1966-12-31 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Moody Dunbar, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Moody Dunbar, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $14M 9.289531870843641% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 195 | $12M |
| 2023 | 1 | 194 | $12M |
| 2024 | 1 | 183 | $14M |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Tennessee
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Ballad Health 401(a) Plan $463M · 5,937
- Shreveport Electrical Industry Profit Sharing Plan $77M · 740
- New Orleans Electrical Annuity Plan $66M · 1,451
- Ulps Employee Savings Plan $54M · 236
- University School of Nashville Retirement Plan $34M · 209
Moody Dunbar, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Tennessee, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Poten & Partners Group, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in NY ($12M); by covered participants it is G. B. Cooley Hospital Service District 401(k) Profit Sharing in LA (195 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($12M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (195 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.