Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $1M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 27th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $623,159
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Mckearney Gowan Incorporated · Michigan · Other Services
$1M in assets, 2 participants
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated's Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan reported $1M in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 27th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #4,298 in Other Services (8,398 peers)
Other Services sector rank
Within Other Services, Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan ranks #4,298 of 8,398 2022 filers by assets (1610% of the sector average)-$1M for 2 participants.
- #4,298
- in Other Services (8,398 peers)
- +3.3%
- assets growth YoY
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,246,318 27th percentile higher than 27% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 832763763 · Mckearney Gowan Incorporated PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan · $1M · 2 · 27th
- EIN $1M
- EIN 2
- EIN 27th
- EIN Profit Sharing
- EIN near Scavet Technologies LLC 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan
- EIN ind #4298
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Other Services retirement plans → · Plans in Michigan →
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Other Services filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $1M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $1M |
| Net Income | $39K |
| Employer EIN | 832763763 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2018-12-10 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Mckearney Gowan Incorporated)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Mckearney Gowan Incorporated plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $2M 36.8862521443163% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | $1M |
| 2023 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Michigan
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Henry Ford Health System Retirement Savings Plan $1.6B · 15,480
- Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford $475M · 10,395
- Ohio Carpenters' Annuity Plan $371M · 8,330
- IBEW Local 150 Supplemental Pension Fund $248M · 1,286
- Hemlock Semiconductor Operations LLC Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan $234M · 687
Mckearney Gowan Incorporated Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Michigan, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Scavet Technologies LLC 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan in NJ ($1M); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($1M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.