Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Michigan Glass Company Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $188K
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 10th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $94,116
- Avg per participant Below avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Profit Sharing Plan and Trust · Sponsored by Michigan Glass Company · Michigan · Other Services
$188K in assets, 2 participants
Michigan Glass Company's Profit Sharing Plan and Trust reported $188K in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 10th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #1,858 in Other Services (8,398 peers)
What the 2022 filing shows
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust holds $188K for 2 participants - about $94,116 per participant, among the smaller plans by assets on file.
- #1,858
- in Other Services (8,398 peers)
- +0.1%
- assets growth YoY
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust among the smaller filed plans by assets
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$188,232 10th percentile higher than 10% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 382470070 · Michigan Glass Company PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust · $188K · 2 · 10th
- ASSETS $188K
- PCT 2
- EIN 10th
- RANK Profit Sharing
- PHOTO near L2 Property Partners, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
- IND ind #1858
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Other Services retirement plans → · Plans in Michigan →
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust in the asset neighbourhood
Filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $188K |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $188K |
| Net Income | $137 |
| Employer EIN | 382470070 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1986-07-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Michigan Glass Company)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Michigan Glass Company plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- N/A
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | $188K |
| 2023 | 1 | 2 | $192K |
| 2024 | 1 | 2 | N/A |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Michigan
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Henry Ford Health System Retirement Savings Plan $1.6B · 15,480
- Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford $475M · 10,395
- Ohio Carpenters' Annuity Plan $371M · 8,330
- IBEW Local 150 Supplemental Pension Fund $248M · 1,286
- Hemlock Semiconductor Operations LLC Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan $234M · 687
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Michigan, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is L2 Property Partners, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in ND ($188K); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($188K here).
- L2 Property Partners, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (ND) $188K · 2
- Bigheart Holdings, Inc. Retirement Plan (OK) $188K · 5
- Ibrahim Llop Retirement Plan (PR) $188K · 1
- Margaret L Miller Solo 401 K (FL) $188K · 1
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.