Other · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Community Youth Center Retirement Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $4M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 153
- Participants Small participant base
- 48th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $28,881
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Community Youth Center · California · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$4M in assets, 153 participants
Community Youth Center's Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan reported $4M in total assets and 153 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 48th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #10,702 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
Coverage in California
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan covers 153 participants in California, about 24% of the average California filer (state average ~630 per filing). Assets: $4M.
- #10,702
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- +39.7%
- assets growth YoY
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$4,418,843 48th percentile higher than 48% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (153 participants).
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 941728818 · Community Youth Center PY 2022 · Other
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan · $4M · 153 · 48th
- PCT $4M
- PCT 153
- PCT 48th
- PCT Other
- PCT near Advisewell, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
- PCT ind #10702
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
California filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $4M |
| Net Income | $1M |
| Employer EIN | 941728818 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2007-03-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Community Youth Center)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Community Youth Center plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $7M 66.52008229303462% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 153 | $4M |
| 2023 | 1 | 176 | $6M |
| 2024 | 1 | 173 | $7M |
Nearby Other Plans in California
Peer Other plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Stanford Contributory Retirement Plan $9.4B · 22,514
- Sutter Health 403(b) Savings Plan $5.3B · 48,591
- Stanford Health Care Retirement Savings Plan $4.5B · 20,237
- Caltech Base Retirement Plan $4.2B · 9,827
- University of Southern California Tax-Deferred Annuity Plan $3.7B · 22,632
Community Youth Center 403(b) Retirement Plan's out-of-state Other peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Other by assets is Advisewell, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan in LA ($4M); by covered participants it is National University of Health Sciences Defined Contribution Retirement Plan in IL (153 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($4M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (153 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.