Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $339K
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 15th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $339,442
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez · Puerto Rico · Wholesale Trade
$339K in assets, 1 participants
Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez's C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan reported $339K in total assets and 1 participant in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 15th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #482 in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
2022 asset change
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan pulled back noticeably 12.2% in 2022 ($386K → $339K) for 1 participant.
- #482
- in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
- -12.2%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $47K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$339,442 15th percentile higher than 15% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 597011601 · Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan · $339K · 1 · 15th
- VS-ST $339K
- BOY 1
- SCH 15th
- EBSA Profit Sharing
- PART near Lala & Fam, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
- TYPE ind #482
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Wholesale Trade retirement plans → · Plans in Puerto Rico →
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez years around the 2022 move
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Carlos a. Picaporte Adanez plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $366K 7.877634470690133% vs 2022
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $339K |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $366K |
2022 asset-move particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $386K |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $339K |
| Net Income | -$47K |
| Employer EIN | 597011601 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2021-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Puerto Rico
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- The Retirement and Savings Plan for Amgen Manufacturing, Limited $611M · 2,614
- Popular, Inc. Pr Savings and Investment Plan $561M · 7,773
- The Savings Plan for Lilly Affiliate Employees in Puerto Rico $336M · 1,038
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Puerto Rico Tax Saving Capital Accumulation Plan $158M · 743
- The Oriental Bank Coda Profit Sharing Plan $110M · 2,082
C. Picaporte Adanez Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Puerto Rico, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Lala & Fam, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in TX ($339K); by covered participants it is Luke Krumnow, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in TX (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($339K here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.