Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $6M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 8
- Participants Small participant base
- 54th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $745,275
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. · Ohio · Construction
$6M in assets, 8 participants
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc.'s Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan reported $6M in total assets and 8 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 54th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #5,322 in Construction (9,927 peers)
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. multi-year trail
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc.'s plans moved +12.2% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan at $6M / 8 participants.
- #5,322
- in Construction (9,927 peers)
- +19.7%
- assets growth YoY
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Construction and all filers
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$5,962,199 Top 46% higher than 54% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (8 participants), the leftmost band.
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 310844131 · Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · $6M · 8 · 54th
- VS-ST $6M
- BOY 8
- SCH 54th
- EBSA Profit Sharing
- PART near Smith Pump Company, Inc. 401(k) Plan
- TYPE ind #5322
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Construction retirement plans → · Plans in Ohio →
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $7M 12.178862194972023% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 8 | $6M |
| 2023 | 1 | 8 | $6M |
| 2024 | 1 | 6 | $7M |
Wm. J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $5M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $6M |
| Net Income | $980K |
| Employer EIN | 310844131 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1975-09-30 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Ohio
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Cleveland Clinic Investment Pension Plan $1.2B · 46,417
- The Employer Retirement Savings Plan- Premier Health Partners $202M · 11,973
- White Castle Profit Sharing Plan $172M · 4,241
- Holzer Health System 401a Profit Sharing Plan $166M · 1,876
- Southern Ohio Medical Center Retirement Savings Program $136M · 3,162
Wm J. Shaffer Assoc., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Ohio, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Smith Pump Company, Inc. 401(k) Plan in TX ($6M); by covered participants it is Verona Insurance Agency, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in NJ (8 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($6M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (8 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.