Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2023
Employment Commons Lca Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 31
- Participants Small participant base
- 28th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $49,651
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan · Sponsored by Employment Commons Lca · Colorado · Administrative & Support Services
$2M in assets, 31 participants
Employment Commons Lca's Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan reported $2M in total assets and 31 participants in its 2023 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 28th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #2,248 in Administrative & Support Services (4,372 peers)
Administrative & Support Services sector rank
Within Administrative & Support Services, Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan ranks #2,248 of 4,372 2023 filers by assets (1875% of the sector average)-$2M for 31 participants.
- #2,248
- in Administrative & Support Services (4,372 peers)
- +142.9%
- assets growth YoY
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2023 · DOL Form 5500
$1,539,194 28th percentile higher than 28% of 127,068 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2023
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2023 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan is a small filing (31 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 851138180 · Employment Commons Lca PY 2023 · Profit Sharing
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan · $2M · 31 · 28th
- IND $2M
- IND 31
- IND 28th
- IND Profit Sharing
- IND near Diaz Empire Retirement Plan
- IND ind #2248
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Administrative & Support Services retirement plans → · Plans in Colorado →
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Administrative & Support Services filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $634K |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | $905K |
| Employer EIN | 851138180 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2020-06-15 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Employment Commons Lca)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Employment Commons Lca plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $3M 80.19593371595784% vs 2023
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 31 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 50 | $3M |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Colorado
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Hensel Phelps Hourly Retirement Plan $59M · 695
- Liberty Pr Mobility 401(k) Savings Plans $43M · 1,212
- Amended & Restated Profit Sharing Plan of Midwest Pms $38M · 133
- Peterson Company Profit-Sharing Plan $18M · 26
- Retirement Plan of Public Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc. $16M · 182
Employment Commons Retirement Savings Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Colorado, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Diaz Empire Retirement Plan in CA ($2M); by covered participants it is Cactus Childrens Clinic, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan in AZ (31 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (31 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2023. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.