Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 41st
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.5M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. · California · Transportation & Warehousing
$3M in assets, 2 participants
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc.'s Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan reported $3M in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 41st percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #1,647 in Transportation & Warehousing (3,876 peers)
What the 2022 filing shows
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan holds $3M for 2 participants - about $1.5M per participant, in the lower half of filed plans by assets.
- #1,647
- in Transportation & Warehousing (3,876 peers)
- +1.2%
- assets growth YoY
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Transportation & Warehousing and all filers
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$3,094,389 41st percentile higher than 41% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 941701201 · Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan · $3M · 2 · 41st
- TYPE $3M
- NET 2
- BOOK 41st
- VS-ST Profit Sharing
- BOY near Apple Marketing Company Employee Profit Sharing Plan
- SCH ind #1647
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Transportation & Warehousing retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | $36K |
| Employer EIN | 941701201 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1991-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Gas House Cove Marina, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- N/A
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | $3M |
| 2023 | 1 | 5 | N/A |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in California
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Intel Retirement Contribution Plan $6.9B · 22,216
- Scpmg Keogh Plan $5.6B · 9,727
- Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan $5.6B · 67,173
- Memorialcare Retirement Plan $1.2B · 5,104
- Cedars-Sinai Health System Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $797M · 11,344
Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Apple Marketing Company Employee Profit Sharing Plan in MI ($3M); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.