Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 3
- Participants Small participant base
- 41st
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.0M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan · Sponsored by A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. · New York · Wholesale Trade
$3M in assets, 3 participants
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc.'s A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan reported $3M in total assets and 3 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 41st percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #1,944 in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. multi-year trail
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc.'s plans moved +18.4% in assets from 2022 to 2023; this filing shows A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan at $3M / 3 participants.
- #1,944
- in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
- +15.5%
- assets growth YoY
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Wholesale Trade and all filers
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$3,093,946 41st percentile higher than 41% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan is a micro filing (3 participants), the leftmost band.
Plan-year Form 5500 strip
Filing strip 132593680 · A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan · $3M · 3 · 41st
- TYPE $3M
- TYPE 3
- TYPE 41st
- TYPE Profit Sharing
- TYPE near Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
- TYPE ind #1944
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Wholesale Trade retirement plans → · Plans in New York →
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $4M 18.379344694445216% vs 2022
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 3 | $3M |
| 2023 | 1 | 3 | $4M |
A. Thomas Farris & Son Inc. filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | $415K |
| Employer EIN | 132593680 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1968-10-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in New York
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Annuity Plan of the Electrical Industry $2.0B · 19,997
- Annuity Fund Iuoe Local 15, 15a, 15c, 15d AFL-CIO $1.6B · 3,494
- Annuity Fd of the Iuoe Local Union 94, 94a, 94b AFL-CIO $1.5B · 5,696
- The Research Foundation for Suny Retirement Plan $1.1B · 11,139
- Mason Tenders District Council Annuity Fund $837M · 11,072
A. Thomas Farris & Son, Inc. Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside New York, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Gas House Cove Marina, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in CA ($3M); by covered participants it is Crosmac Corp. Retirement Plan in NJ (3 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (3 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.