Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Rubin & Rubin PC Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 30th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $796,806
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Rubin & Rubin PC · Maryland · Professional & Technical Services
$2M in assets, 2 participants
Rubin & Rubin PC's Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan reported $2M in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 30th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #5,796 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Rubin & Rubin PC multi-year trail
Rubin & Rubin PC's plans moved -17.4% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan at $2M / 2 participants.
- #5,796
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- -12.4%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $225K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,593,612 30th percentile higher than 30% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 521274385 · Rubin & Rubin PC PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan · $2M · 2 · 30th
- IND $2M
- EOY 2
- 5500 30th
- ASSETS Profit Sharing
- PCT near Warren Bank Profit Sharing Plan
- EIN ind #5796
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in Maryland →
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Rubin & Rubin PC multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Rubin & Rubin PC plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $1M 17.35265547699189% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 3 | $1M |
Rubin & Rubin PC filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $2M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$225K |
| Employer EIN | 521274385 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1984-12-11 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Maryland
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund $2.4B · 24,528
- Nfl Player Annuity Program $1.4B · 2,781
- Major League Baseball Players Investment Plan $928M · 4,122
- International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Annuity Plan $614M · 10,013
- Nfl Player Capital Accumulation Plan $460M · 2,732
Rubin & Rubin Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Maryland, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Warren Bank Profit Sharing Plan in AR ($2M); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.