Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Up North, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 2
- Participants Small participant base
- 35th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $1.1M
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Up North, Inc. · Minnesota · Food Services & Accommodation
$2M in assets, 2 participants
Up North, Inc.'s Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan reported $2M in total assets and 2 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 35th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #3,218 in Food Services & Accommodation (4,592 peers)
Food Services & Accommodation sector rank
Within Food Services & Accommodation, Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan ranks #3,218 of 4,592 2022 filers by assets (917% of the sector average)-$2M for 2 participants.
- #3,218
- in Food Services & Accommodation (4,592 peers)
- -1.0%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $21K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Food Services & Accommodation and all filers
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,132,785 35th percentile higher than 35% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan is a micro filing (2 participants), the leftmost band.
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 371824427 · Up North, Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan · $2M · 2 · 35th
- RANK $2M
- RANK 2
- RANK 35th
- RANK Profit Sharing
- RANK near Tcherkassova LLC Profit Sharing Plan
- RANK ind #3218
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Food Services & Accommodation retirement plans → · Plans in Minnesota →
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Food Services & Accommodation filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $2M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$21K |
| Employer EIN | 371824427 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2016-04-29 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Up North, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Up North, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $2M 1.2736867522980515% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
| 2024 | 1 | 2 | $2M |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Minnesota
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Essentia Health Retirement Plan $1.6B · 14,444
- Pipe Trades Services Mn Pension Supplement Fund $1.4B · 6,268
- Allina 403(b) Retirement Savings Plan $847M · 10,170
- Fairview Health Services Pension Plan $542M · 5,177
- Cargill Employee Retirement Account Plan $397M · 18,794
Up North, Inc. Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Minnesota, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Tcherkassova LLC Profit Sharing Plan in NJ ($2M); by covered participants it is Johnson Goldberg & Brown, Ltd Profit Sharing Plan in IL (2 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (2 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.