Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $1M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 3
- Participants Small participant base
- 28th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $426,809
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Triple S Farms · Florida · Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
$1M in assets, 3 participants
Triple S Farms's Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan reported $1M in total assets and 3 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 28th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #447 in Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing (1,523 peers)
Triple S Farms multi-year trail
Triple S Farms's plans moved +15.8% in assets from 2022 to 2024; this filing shows Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan at $1M / 3 participants.
- #447
- in Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing (1,523 peers)
- -9.7%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $137K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,280,428 28th percentile higher than 28% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (3 participants), the leftmost band.
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 592252589 · Triple S Farms PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan · $1M · 3 · 28th
- EBSA $1M
- EBSA 3
- EBSA 28th
- EBSA Profit Sharing
- EBSA near Castnet Holdings Inc. Retirement Plan
- EBSA ind #447
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing retirement plans → · Plans in Florida →
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Triple S Farms multi-year asset trail
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Triple S Farms plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $1M 15.8058867816074% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 3 | $1M |
| 2023 | 1 | 3 | $1M |
| 2024 | 1 | 3 | $1M |
Triple S Farms filing trail (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $1M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $1M |
| Net Income | -$137K |
| Employer EIN | 592252589 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1987-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Florida
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Retirement Wealth Builder Plan of Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP $4.1B · 44,915
- Raymond James Financial, Inc. & Affiliates Profit Sharing Plan $985M · 14,201
- Orlando Health, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan 401a $418M · 23,825
- Shands Health Care Matched Savings Account 401(a) $349M · 9,486
- American Maritime Officers Defined Contribution Plan $245M · 4,132
Triple S Farms Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Florida, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Castnet Holdings Inc. Retirement Plan in LA ($1M); by covered participants it is Crosmac Corp. Retirement Plan in NJ (3 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($1M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (3 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.