401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $9M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 39
- Participants Small participant base
- 63rd
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $231,105
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Cottonwood Ob/Gyn · Utah · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$9M in assets, 39 participants
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn's Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan reported $9M in total assets and 39 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 63rd percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #13,730 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
2022 asset change
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan pulled back noticeably 10.9% in 2022 ($10M → $9M) for 39 participants.
- #13,730
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- -10.9%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $1M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$9,013,089 Top 37% higher than 63% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan is a small filing (39 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 870374206 · Cottonwood Ob/Gyn PY 2022 · 401(k)
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan · $9M · 39 · 63rd
- RANK $9M
- RANK 39
- RANK 63rd
- RANK 401(k)
- RANK near Lauren International, Ltd. 401(k) Retirement Plan
- RANK ind #13730
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in Utah →
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn years around the 2022 move
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Cottonwood Ob/Gyn plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $9M 5.022473427256737% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 39 | $9M |
| 2023 | 1 | 34 | $8M |
| 2024 | 1 | 38 | $9M |
2022 asset-move particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $10M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $9M |
| Net Income | -$1M |
| Employer EIN | 870374206 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1989-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Utah
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Deseret 401(k) Plan $4.7B · 23,455
- Intermountain Healthcare Savings Plus 401(k) Plan $3.6B · 42,446
- Zions Bancorporation, N.a. Payshelter 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan $1.5B · 9,870
- Skywest, Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan $952M · 16,878
- Autoliv Asp, Inc. Employee Savings and Investment Plan $588M · 4,068
Cottonwood Ob/Gyn Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Utah, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Lauren International, Ltd. 401(k) Retirement Plan in OH ($9M); by covered participants it is Patton Electronics Company 401(k) Plan in MD (39 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($9M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (39 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.