ESOP · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc ESOP
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $35M
- Total assets Below avg plan size
- 193
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 85th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $180,081
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP · Sponsored by Midwest Bancorporation, Inc · Missouri · Finance & Insurance
$35M in assets, 193 participants
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc's Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP reported $35M in total assets and 193 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 85th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #6,949 in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
Coverage in Missouri
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP covers 193 participants in Missouri, about 26% of the average Missouri filer (state average ~737 per filing). Assets: $35M.
- #6,949
- in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
- +14.4%
- assets growth YoY
- 0.3×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP's outsized position by total assets
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$34,755,723 Top 15% higher than 85% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP sits mid-pack in the medium band (193 participants).
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 431771852 · Midwest Bancorporation, Inc PY 2022 · ESOP
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP · $35M · 193 · 85th
- PART $35M
- TYPE 193
- NET 85th
- BOOK ESOP
- VS-ST near Kimberlite Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan
- BOY ind #6949
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with What is an ESOP? → · Plans in Missouri →
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP in the asset neighbourhood
Missouri filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $30M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $35M |
| Net Income | $4M |
| Employer EIN | 431771852 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1987-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Midwest Bancorporation, Inc)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Midwest Bancorporation, Inc plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $35M 1.5507028871187631% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 193 | $35M |
| 2023 | 1 | 198 | $31M |
| 2024 | 1 | 205 | $35M |
Nearby ESOP Plans in Missouri
Peer ESOP plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Burns & Mcdonnell, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $4.0B · 7,358
- Mccarthy Employee Stock Ownership Plan $1.2B · 3,252
- Arco DB Companies, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $353M · 432
- Je Dunn Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust $332M · 2,641
- Src Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust $238M · 1,388
Midwest Bancorporation, Inc and Affiliates ESOP's out-of-state ESOP peers by assets and headcount
Outside Missouri, the nearest ESOP by assets is Kimberlite Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan in CA ($35M); by covered participants it is The Gillette Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan in MA (193 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($35M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (193 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.