ESOP · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
The Ame Group ESOP
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $25M
- Total assets Below avg plan size
- 200
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 80th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $125,425
- Avg per participant Near avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan · Sponsored by The Ame Group · Indiana · Professional & Technical Services
$25M in assets, 200 participants
The Ame Group's The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan reported $25M in total assets and 200 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 80th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #17,478 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Coverage in Indiana
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan covers 200 participants in Indiana, about 37% of the average Indiana filer (state average ~541 per filing). Assets: $25M.
- #17,478
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- +2.3%
- assets growth YoY
- 0.3×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan's outsized position by total assets
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$25,085,000 Top 20% higher than 80% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (200 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 351630314 · The Ame Group PY 2022 · ESOP
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan · $25M · 200 · 80th
- EOY $25M
- 5500 200
- ASSETS 80th
- PCT ESOP
- EIN near Sunflower Landscaping and Maintenance, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
- RANK ind #17478
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with What is an ESOP? → · Plans in Indiana →
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Indiana filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $25M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $25M |
| Net Income | $569K |
| Employer EIN | 351630314 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1998-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (The Ame Group)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All The Ame Group plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $58M 82.94370715291186% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 414 | $32M |
| 2023 | 2 | 417 | $35M |
| 2024 | 2 | 353 | $58M |
Nearby ESOP Plans in Indiana
Peer ESOP plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Jasper Holdings, Inc Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust $1.5B · 3,842
- Urschel Laboratories Employee Stock Ownership Plan $315M · 467
- Nibco Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $310M · 1,233
- Wood-Mizer Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $115M · 464
- Superior Industrial Solutions, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan $114M · 333
The Ame Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan's out-of-state ESOP peers by assets and headcount
Outside Indiana, the nearest ESOP by assets is Sunflower Landscaping and Maintenance, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in FL ($25M); by covered participants it is West Yost & Associates, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust in CA (200 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($25M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (200 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.