Other · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Polaris Project Retirement Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 138
- Participants Small participant base
- 40th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $21,391
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Polaris Project 403(b) Plan · Sponsored by Polaris Project · District of Columbia · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$3M in assets, 138 participants
Polaris Project's Polaris Project 403(b) Plan reported $3M in total assets and 138 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 40th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #8,733 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
Coverage in District of Columbia
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan covers 138 participants in District of Columbia, about 9% of the average District of Columbia filer (state average ~1,456 per filing). Assets: $3M.
- #8,733
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- -4.8%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $150K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,952,020 40th percentile higher than 40% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Polaris Project 403(b) Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (138 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 030391561 · Polaris Project PY 2022 · Other
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan · $3M · 138 · 40th
- IND $3M
- EOY 138
- 5500 40th
- ASSETS Other
- PCT near Roofers Local 149 Defined Contribution Pension Fund
- EIN ind #8733
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in District of Columbia →
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan in the asset neighbourhood
District of Columbia filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$150K |
| Employer EIN | 030391561 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2009-04-24 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Polaris Project)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Polaris Project plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $4M 34.04397666682475% vs 2022
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 138 | $3M |
| 2023 | 1 | 135 | $4M |
Nearby Other Plans in District of Columbia
Peer Other plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' Pension Benefit Fund $2.5B · 419,935
- Georgetown University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $2.0B · 4,918
- American University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan $1.1B · 2,632
- Howard University Savings Plan $1.0B · 5,159
- Georgetown University Voluntary Contribution Retirement Plan $741M · 13,020
Polaris Project 403(b) Plan's out-of-state Other peers by assets and headcount
Outside District of Columbia, the nearest Other by assets is Roofers Local 149 Defined Contribution Pension Fund in MI ($3M); by covered participants it is Harvesters 403b Plan in MO (138 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (138 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.