401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Joyce Howe 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 4
- Participants Small participant base
- 34th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $496,873
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Joyce Howe · Michigan · Professional & Technical Services
$2M in assets, 4 participants
Joyce Howe's Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan reported $2M in total assets and 4 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 34th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #6,527 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
2022 asset change
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan contracted severely 31.4% in 2022 ($3M → $2M) for 4 participants.
- #6,527
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- -31.4%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $908K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Professional & Technical Services and all filers
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$1,987,492 34th percentile higher than 34% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan is a micro filing (4 participants), the leftmost band.
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 382661896 · Joyce Howe PY 2022 · 401(k)
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan · $2M · 4 · 34th
- 5500 $2M
- ASSETS 4
- PCT 34th
- EIN 401(k)
- RANK near Ogle School Management LLC 401(k) Plan
- PHOTO ind #6527
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in Michigan →
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Joyce Howe years around the 2022 move
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Joyce Howe plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- N/A
- 2023 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 4 | $2M |
| 2023 | 1 | 3 | N/A |
2022 asset-move particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$908K |
| Employer EIN | 382661896 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1988-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Michigan
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- General Motors Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees in the United States $18.1B · 43,382
- Ford Motor Co. Savings and Stock Investment Plan for Salaried Employees $13.8B · 32,974
- The Dow Chemical Company Employees' Savings Plan $9.3B · 16,930
- The General Motors Personal Savings Plan for Hourly-Rate Employees in the United States $7.5B · 40,458
- Ford Motor Co. Tax-Efficient Savings Plan for Hourly Employees $6.4B · 57,811
Joyce M Howe Cpapc Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Michigan, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Ogle School Management LLC 401(k) Plan in TX ($2M); by covered participants it is Damon Productions, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan in CA (4 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (4 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.