Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $34M
- Total assets Below avg plan size
- 70
- Participants Small participant base
- 84th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $482,188
- Avg per participant High balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP · Maryland · Professional & Technical Services
$34M in assets, 70 participants
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP's Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan reported $34M in total assets and 70 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 84th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #18,300 in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
Where Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan sits by assets
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan sits in the top quartile of all filed plans by assets, $34M for 70 participants (~$482,188/participant), down 23.1% in 2022.
- #18,300
- in Professional & Technical Services (21,562 peers)
- -23.1%
- assets change YoY
- 0.3×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
The plan reported a net loss of $10M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan's outsized position by total assets
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$33,753,189 Top 16% higher than 84% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan among smaller filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan is a small filing (70 participants) on this national headcount ladder.
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 521571248 · Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan · $34M · 70 · 84th
- BOOK $34M
- BOOK 70
- BOOK 84th
- BOOK Profit Sharing
- BOOK near Abx Air, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
- BOOK ind #18300
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Professional & Technical Services retirement plans → · Plans in Maryland →
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $44M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $34M |
| Net Income | -$10M |
| Employer EIN | 521571248 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1989-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Maryland
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund $2.4B · 24,528
- Nfl Player Annuity Program $1.4B · 2,781
- Major League Baseball Players Investment Plan $928M · 4,122
- International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Annuity Plan $614M · 10,013
- Nfl Player Capital Accumulation Plan $460M · 2,732
Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Maryland, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Abx Air, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan in OH ($34M); by covered participants it is Norton Simon Museum Savings Plan in CA (70 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($34M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (70 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.