401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $3M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 164
- Participants Small participant base
- 39th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $17,103
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. · Ohio · Finance & Insurance
$3M in assets, 164 participants
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc.'s Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan reported $3M in total assets and 164 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 39th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #2,458 in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
Coverage in Ohio
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan covers 164 participants in Ohio, about 21% of the average Ohio filer (state average ~765 per filing). Assets: $3M.
- #2,458
- in Finance & Insurance (9,261 peers)
- -16.3%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $546K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Finance & Insurance and all filers
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,804,940 39th percentile higher than 39% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (164 participants).
Published 5500 schedule card
Filing strip 341828363 · Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. PY 2022 · 401(k)
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · $3M · 164 · 39th
- PART $3M
- PART 164
- PART 39th
- PART 401(k)
- PART near Resilience360 Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
- PART ind #2458
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Finance & Insurance retirement plans → · Plans in Ohio →
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Ohio filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $3M |
| Net Income | -$546K |
| Employer EIN | 341828363 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2000-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Ohio
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- The Sherwin-Williams Company 401(k) Plan $8.3B · 44,890
- The Progressive 401(k) Plan $7.6B · 50,299
- The Kroger Co. 401(k) Retirement Savings Account Plan $7.3B · 116,133
- Nationwide Savings Plan $6.7B · 24,278
- Marathon Petroleum Thrift Plan $6.4B · 17,666
Great Lakes Auto Network,Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Ohio, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Resilience360 Inc. Retirement Savings Plan in CA ($3M); by covered participants it is Inserv Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in NC (164 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($3M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (164 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- Inserv Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (NC) 164 · 0 off
- Energy Management Collaborative 401 (K) Plan (MN) 164 · 0 off
- Groschopp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (IA) 164 · 0 off
- Indiana University Credit Union 401(k) Plan (IN) 164 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.