Profit Sharing · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Exceptional Opportunities, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $2M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 107
- Participants Small participant base
- 34th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $19,051
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Exceptional Opportunities, Inc. · Iowa · Healthcare & Social Assistance
$2M in assets, 107 participants
Exceptional Opportunities, Inc.'s Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan reported $2M in total assets and 107 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 34th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #7,074 in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
Coverage in Iowa
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan covers 107 participants in Iowa, about 18% of the average Iowa filer (state average ~609 per filing). Assets: $2M.
- #7,074
- in Healthcare & Social Assistance (20,060 peers)
- -21.9%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $467K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Healthcare & Social Assistance and all filers
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$2,038,443 34th percentile higher than 34% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (107 participants).
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 420953931 · Exceptional Opportunities, Inc. PY 2022 · Profit Sharing
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan · $2M · 107 · 34th
- VS-ST $2M
- VS-ST 107
- VS-ST 34th
- VS-ST Profit Sharing
- VS-ST near Fourslide Industries Incorporated Profit Sharing Plan
- VS-ST ind #7074
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Healthcare & Social Assistance retirement plans → · Plans in Iowa →
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Iowa filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $3M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $2M |
| Net Income | -$467K |
| Employer EIN | 420953931 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1995-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Profit Sharing Plans in Iowa
Peer Profit Sharing plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Liberty Pattern Company Profit Sharing Plan $21M · 12
- Cambridge Investment Group, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan $17M · 772
- Palmer Lutheran Health Center, Inc. 403(b) Plan $17M · 219
- Ts Banking Group Savings Plan $15M · 227
- Hwh Corporation Employees' Profit Sharing Plan and Trust $14M · 80
Exceptional Opportunities Retirement Plan's out-of-state Profit Sharing peers by assets and headcount
Outside Iowa, the nearest Profit Sharing by assets is Fourslide Industries Incorporated Profit Sharing Plan in CA ($2M); by covered participants it is The Rf & F Employee Profit Sharing Plan in MD (107 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($2M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (107 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- The Rf & F Employee Profit Sharing Plan (MD) 107 · 0 off
- The Mines Press, Inc. 401(k) Plan (NY) 107 · 0 off
- Foam Pack Retirement Plan (PR) 107 · 0 off
- Coreplus Savings & Retirement Plan (PR) 107 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.