401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $24M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 185
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 80th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $132,214
- Avg per participant Near avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan · Sponsored by Tarana Wireless, Inc. · California · Information & Media
$24M in assets, 185 participants
Tarana Wireless, Inc.'s Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan reported $24M in total assets and 185 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 80th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #2,091 in Information & Media (2,911 peers)
Coverage in California
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan covers 185 participants in California, about 29% of the average California filer (state average ~630 per filing). Assets: $24M.
- #2,091
- in Information & Media (2,911 peers)
- +5.4%
- assets growth YoY
- 0.2×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan's outsized position by total assets
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$24,459,608 Top 20% higher than 80% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (185 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 264507702 · Tarana Wireless, Inc. PY 2022 · 401(k)
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan · $24M · 185 · 80th
- PCT $24M
- EIN 185
- RANK 80th
- PHOTO 401(k)
- IND near Kihomac, Inc 401(k) Plan
- EOY ind #2091
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Information & Media retirement plans → · Plans in California →
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan in the asset neighbourhood
California filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $23M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $24M |
| Net Income | $1M |
| Employer EIN | 264507702 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2012-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Tarana Wireless, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Tarana Wireless, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $49M 99.14430353912459% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 185 | $24M |
| 2023 | 1 | 277 | $38M |
| 2024 | 1 | 309 | $49M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in California
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan $45.8B · 205,865
- Google LLC 401(k) Savings Plan $28.9B · 102,963
- Oracle Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan $21.9B · 46,320
- Chevron Employee Savings Investment Plan $18.6B · 19,946
- Intel 401(k) Savings Plan $18.4B · 54,672
Tarana Wireless, Inc. 401(k) Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside California, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Kihomac, Inc 401(k) Plan in VA ($24M); by covered participants it is Brew City Pizza, Inc. Retirement Plan in WI (185 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($24M here).
- Kihomac, Inc 401(k) Plan (VA) $24M · 298
- First Community Bank 401(k) Plan (SC) $24M · 245
- Frankenmuth Credit Union 401(k) Retirement Savings (MI) $24M · 434
- Miami Valley Child Development Centers, Inc. 401(k) Plan (OH) $24M · 484
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (185 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.