Defined Benefit (Pension) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund Pension Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $114M
- Total assets Near avg plan size
- 705
- Participants Below avg headcount
- 93rd
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $161,548
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund · Sponsored by Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund · Missouri · Construction
$114M in assets, 705 participants
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund's Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund reported $114M in total assets and 705 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 93rd percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #9,152 in Construction (9,927 peers)
Where Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund sits by assets
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund sits in the top 10% of all filed plans by assets, $114M for 705 participants (~$161,548/participant), up 5.7% in 2022.
- #9,152
- in Construction (9,927 peers)
- +5.7%
- assets growth YoY
- 1.1×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund's outsized position by total assets
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$113,891,194 Top 7% higher than 93% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund sits mid-pack in the medium band (705 participants).
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 430698242 · Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund PY 2022 · Defined Benefit (Pension)
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund · $114M · 705 · 93rd
- BOOK $114M
- BOOK 705
- BOOK 93rd
- BOOK Defined Benefit (Pension)
- BOOK near Unitehere Northwest Pension Trust Fund
- BOOK ind #9152
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Construction retirement plans → · Plans in Missouri →
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund in the asset neighbourhood
Scale-class filing particulars (2022)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $108M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $114M |
| Net Income | $6M |
| Employer EIN | 430698242 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1960-05-20 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Nearby Defined Benefit (Pension) Plans in Missouri
Peer Defined Benefit (Pension) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust $7.5B · 31,010
- Ameren Retirement Plan $4.4B · 10,080
- Co-Op Retirement Plan $3.4B · 15,460
- Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis $3.3B · 8,767
- Emerson Electric Company Retirement Plan $3.1B · 4,763
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund's out-of-state Defined Benefit (Pension) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Missouri, the nearest Defined Benefit (Pension) by assets is Unitehere Northwest Pension Trust Fund in WA ($114M); by covered participants it is Northwest Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers Pension Plan in WA (705 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($114M here).
- Unitehere Northwest Pension Trust Fund (WA) $114M · 1,778
- Oapi Retirement Plan (NJ) $114M · 95
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 7, Zone 1 Pension Plan (MI) $114M · 554
- Smwia Staff Pension Plan (DC) $114M · 80
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (705 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.