401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
The Chicago Community Trust 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $18M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 105
- Participants Small participant base
- 76th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $175,411
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust · Sponsored by The Chicago Community Trust · Illinois · Other Services
$18M in assets, 105 participants
The Chicago Community Trust's Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust reported $18M in total assets and 105 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 76th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #7,292 in Other Services (8,398 peers)
Coverage in Illinois
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust covers 105 participants in Illinois, about 13% of the average Illinois filer (state average ~779 per filing). Assets: $18M.
- #7,292
- in Other Services (8,398 peers)
- +17.2%
- assets growth YoY
- 0.2×
- vs typical plan assets (national mean)
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust's outsized position by total assets
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$18,418,203 Top 24% higher than 76% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust sits mid-pack in the medium band (105 participants).
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 362167000 · The Chicago Community Trust PY 2022 · 401(k)
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust · $18M · 105 · 76th
- EOY $18M
- 5500 105
- ASSETS 76th
- PCT 401(k)
- EIN near M & H Enterprises, Inc. 401(k) Plan
- RANK ind #7292
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Other Services retirement plans → · Plans in Illinois →
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust in the asset neighbourhood
Illinois filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $16M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $18M |
| Net Income | $3M |
| Employer EIN | 362167000 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1990-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (The Chicago Community Trust)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All The Chicago Community Trust plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $25M 34.80678326761845% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 105 | $18M |
| 2023 | 1 | 124 | $23M |
| 2024 | 1 | 134 | $25M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Illinois
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- State Farm 401(k) Savings Plan $14.7B · 53,616
- Accenture United States 401(k) Match and Savings Plan $14.3B · 66,653
- Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Plan $13.3B · 36,136
- United Airlines Pilot Retirement Account Plan $11.8B · 13,437
- Walgreens Retirement Savings Plan $11.7B · 238,072
Employee Benefit Plan of the Chicago Community Trust's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Illinois, the nearest 401(k) by assets is M & H Enterprises, Inc. 401(k) Plan in TX ($18M); by covered participants it is Tak Communications Wi LLC 401(k) Plan in SD (105 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($18M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (105 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.