401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2023
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $7M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 122
- Participants Small participant base
- 50th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $56,074
- Avg per participant Low balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan · Sponsored by Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. · Ohio · Manufacturing
$7M in assets, 122 participants
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc.'s Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan reported $7M in total assets and 122 participants in its 2023 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 50th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #6,488 in Manufacturing (18,722 peers)
Coverage in Ohio
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan covers 122 participants in Ohio, about 16% of the average Ohio filer (state average ~765 per filing). Assets: $7M.
- #6,488
- in Manufacturing (18,722 peers)
- +37.7%
- assets growth YoY
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Manufacturing and all filers
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2023 · DOL Form 5500
$6,840,976 Top 50% higher than 50% of 127,068 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2023
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2023 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (122 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 800966847 · Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. PY 2023 · 401(k)
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan · $7M · 122 · 50th
- RANK $7M
- RANK 122
- RANK 50th
- RANK 401(k)
- RANK near Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
- RANK ind #6488
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Manufacturing retirement plans → · Plans in Ohio →
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Ohio filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $5M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $7M |
| Net Income | $2M |
| Employer EIN | 800966847 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2015-09-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Nanotronics Imaging, Inc.)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $8M 18.031125967990533% vs 2023
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 122 | $7M |
| 2024 | 1 | 92 | $8M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Ohio
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- GE Retirement Savings Plan $19.5B · 59,766
- The Sherwin-Williams Company 401(k) Plan $10.1B · 47,362
- The Progressive 401(k) Plan $9.2B · 56,176
- The Kroger Co. 401(k) Retirement Savings Account Plan $8.4B · 129,769
- Nationwide Savings Plan $7.6B · 24,715
Nanotronics Imaging, Inc. 401(k) Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Ohio, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan in TX ($7M); by covered participants it is G & L Davis Meat Co. Inc. 401(k) Plan in NY (122 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($7M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (122 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
- G & L Davis Meat Co. Inc. 401(k) Plan (NY) 122 · 0 off
- Lurre Construction 401(k) Plan (ID) 122 · 0 off
- Entrada Therapeutics 401(k) Retirement Plan (MA) 122 · 0 off
- Kingfisher Systems, Inc. 401(k) / Profit Sharing Plan (VA) 122 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2023. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.