401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2023
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $9M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 103
- Participants Small participant base
- 56th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $87,312
- Avg per participant Below avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · Sponsored by Ethos Beauty Partners · New Jersey · Retail Trade
$9M in assets, 103 participants
Ethos Beauty Partners's Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan reported $9M in total assets and 103 participants in its 2023 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 56th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #5,628 in Retail Trade (8,414 peers)
Coverage in New Jersey
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan covers 103 participants in New Jersey, about 12% of the average New Jersey filer (state average ~844 per filing). Assets: $9M.
- #5,628
- in Retail Trade (8,414 peers)
- -7.1%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $726K for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan's mid-pack asset rank among Retail Trade and all filers
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2023 · DOL Form 5500
$8,993,099 Top 44% higher than 56% of 127,068 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2023
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2023 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (103 participants).
Form 5500 schedule snapshot
Filing strip 872433975 · Ethos Beauty Partners PY 2023 · 401(k)
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan · $9M · 103 · 56th
- RANK $9M
- PHOTO 103
- IND 56th
- EOY 401(k)
- 5500 near Sentry Management, Inc. 401(k) Plan
- ASSETS ind #5628
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Retail Trade retirement plans → · Plans in New Jersey →
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in the asset neighbourhood
New Jersey filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $10M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $9M |
| Net Income | -$726K |
| Employer EIN | 872433975 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1985-07-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Ethos Beauty Partners)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Ethos Beauty Partners plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $8M 9.324838968191054% vs 2023
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 103 | $9M |
| 2024 | 1 | 122 | $8M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in New Jersey
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan $44.6B · 176,610
- Verizon Savings Plan for Management Employees $27.8B · 78,072
- Johnson and Johnson Savings Plan $22.2B · 41,291
- Ernst & Young Retirement Savings Plan $15.5B · 59,346
- Merck US Savings Plan $13.4B · 26,850
Ethos Beauty Partners 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside New Jersey, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Sentry Management, Inc. 401(k) Plan in FL ($9M); by covered participants it is Obstetrics & Gynecology of Indiana, P.C. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in IN (103 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($9M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (103 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2023. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.