Form 5500 ranking

Largest Pension Funds in the US

The largest private-sector defined benefit pension funds in the US, ranked by total assets reported to the Department of Labor. According to the U.S. Department of Labor's 2024 Form 5500 filings.

Data updated 2026-08-25

$56.4B
#1 Pension Plan
50
Ranked
$932.9B
Combined total assets

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan leads at $56.4B

According to the U.S. Department of Labor's 2024 Form 5500 filings, this ranking covers the top 50 pension plans by total assets. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan leads at $56.4B; the full list totals $932.9B combined.

  • $932.9B combined across 50
  • 50 pension plans ranked

The ranking in one line

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan leads with $56.4B in total assets; the 50 pension plans ranked here hold $932.9B.

$56.4B
#1 - Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
50
pension plans ranked
$932.9B
combined total assets

Context

What This Ranking Tells Us

Defined benefit (DB) pension plans promise participants a specific monthly benefit at retirement, typically based on salary and years of service. These plans bear all investment risk, the sponsor must fund promised benefits regardless of market performance. Most large private-sector DB plans are now frozen (no new participants) or closed (no new benefit accruals), though existing participants continue receiving benefits. The largest funds in this ranking are a mix of multiemployer union pension funds, like the Western Conference of Teamsters and Central States plans, which pool many employers under collectively bargained agreements, and single-employer plans at legacy industrial, aerospace, and utility companies that established them decades ago.

Methodology

How to Read the Largest Pension Funds in the US Ranking

This page ranks 50 pension plan records by total assets, from Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan at the top ($56.4B) through Chevron Retirement Plan at #50 ($9.7B). The underlying dataset is drawn from the Department of Labor, Form 5500 Annual Return/Report for the 2024 plan year. Each ranked entry links to a detail page with the full set of Form 5500 fields, plan type, sponsor EIN, state, participants, net assets, net income, and prior-year history where available.

Defined benefit (DB) pension plans promise participants a specific monthly benefit at retirement, typically based on salary and years of service. These plans bear all investment risk, the sponsor must fund promised benefits regardless of market performance. Most large private-sector DB plans are now frozen (no new participants) or closed (no new benefit accruals), though existing participants continue receiving benefits. The largest funds in this ranking are a mix of multiemployer union pension funds, like the Western Conference of Teamsters and Central States plans, which pool many employers under collectively bargained agreements, and single-employer plans at legacy industrial, aerospace, and utility companies that established them decades ago.

Rankings based on a single metric can be misleading in isolation - "Total Assets" captures one dimension of a plan's profile and does not measure participant outcomes, fees, investment options, or funding health. Year-to-year movement in this ranking reflects market performance, workforce changes, plan mergers, and filing timing as much as plan quality. This page is informational only, summarizing public DOL disclosures for research and educational purposes, and is not retirement, tax, legal, or financial advice. Before relying on any ranking to evaluate an employer's plan or make retirement decisions, verify the underlying filing on EFAST2 and consult a qualified professional.

The ranked top 50

Pension Plan entries ordered by total assets from the 2024 Form 5500 data.

The current #50 entry is Chevron Retirement Plan at $9.7B. This is the bottom of this fixed top-50 list, not a corpus-wide eligibility threshold.

  1. 1
    100.0% of the leader · rank #1
  2. 2
    85.5% of the leader · rank #2
  3. 3
    75.3% of the leader · rank #3
  4. 4
    73.8% of the leader · rank #4
  5. 5
  6. 6
    61.1% of the leader · rank #6
  7. 7
    50.1% of the leader · rank #7
  8. 8
    48.6% of the leader · rank #8
  9. 9
    47.6% of the leader · rank #9
  10. 10
    41.4% of the leader · rank #10
  11. 11
    37.6% of the leader · rank #11
  12. 12
    37.4% of the leader · rank #12
  13. 13
    36.1% of the leader · rank #13
  14. 14
    33.8% of the leader · rank #14
  15. 15
    33.7% of the leader · rank #15
  16. 16
    33.3% of the leader · rank #16
  17. 17
  18. 18
    31.8% of the leader · rank #18
  19. 19
    31.6% of the leader · rank #19
  20. 20
    31.2% of the leader · rank #20
  21. 21
    30.0% of the leader · rank #21
  22. 22
    29.4% of the leader · rank #22
  23. 23
    28.5% of the leader · rank #23
  24. 24
    27.6% of the leader · rank #24
  25. 25
    27.3% of the leader · rank #25
  26. 26
    27.2% of the leader · rank #26
  27. 27
    26.6% of the leader · rank #27
  28. 28
    26.1% of the leader · rank #28
  29. 29
    24.4% of the leader · rank #29
  30. 30
    22.8% of the leader · rank #30
  31. 31
    21.7% of the leader · rank #31
  32. 32
    21.7% of the leader · rank #32
  33. 33
    21.5% of the leader · rank #33
  34. 34
    21.4% of the leader · rank #34
  35. 35
    21.3% of the leader · rank #35
  36. 36
    20.9% of the leader · rank #36
  37. 37
    20.9% of the leader · rank #37
  38. 38
  39. 39
    20.4% of the leader · rank #39
  40. 40
  41. 41
    20.1% of the leader · rank #41
  42. 42
    19.4% of the leader · rank #42
  43. 43
    19.1% of the leader · rank #43
  44. 44
    18.5% of the leader · rank #44
  45. 45
    18.5% of the leader · rank #45
  46. 46
    18.2% of the leader · rank #46
  47. 47
    17.9% of the leader · rank #47
  48. 48
    17.7% of the leader · rank #48
  49. 49
    17.7% of the leader · rank #49
  50. 50
    17.3% of the leader · rank #50

What this shows Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan is the leader on total assets; each bar is that entry's share of the leader so you can scan relative scale without reading every number. Hover a row for share-of-leader and rank.

Source Department of Labor, Form 5500 Annual Return/Report · plan year 2024

Where the #50 cutoff sits in this top-50 ranking

Total Assets spread across the displayed entries only; it does not represent the full Form 5500 corpus.

$9,731,784,707 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 50 entries in this top-50 ranking

#50 cutoff $0 $56,410,515,702 total assets, bucketed by value

Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among entries in this top-50 ranking.

Source Department of Labor, Form 5500 Annual Return/Report · plan year 2024

Source: Department of Labor, Form 5500 Annual Return/Report.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a defined benefit plan?

A defined benefit plan promises a specific monthly payment at retirement, usually calculated as a formula: years of service x a percentage x final average salary. For example: 30 years x 1.5% x $80,000 = $36,000/year. The employer bears all investment risk and must contribute enough to fund these promises.

Why are pension plans disappearing?

Private-sector DB plans have declined from covering 38% of workers in the 1980s to about 15% today. Employers shifted to 401(k) plans to reduce long-term financial liability, accounting complexity, and regulatory burden. Rising lifespans increased pension costs beyond original projections. Public-sector pensions (government workers) remain common but face their own funding challenges.

Are frozen pensions still safe?

Frozen plans stop accruing new benefits but must still pay benefits already earned. They are backed by accumulated assets and protected by PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) insurance up to certain limits. Well-funded frozen plans pose minimal risk. Underfunded plans may reduce benefits if they enter PBGC trusteeship.

Nearby Rankings

Other leaderboards cut from the same Form 5500 dataset, ranked by different metrics.

What to do with this ranking

Ways to act on this ranking's numbers.

  • Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan leads this ranking at $56.4B, see its full Form 5500 profile. View pension plan profile
  • Compare this ranking side-by-side against 3 other Form 5500 leaderboards. Compare rankings
  • A single-metric ranking like this one doesn't measure fees, funding health, or participant outcomes, read how these rankings are built before drawing conclusions. Read the methodology
  • Browse the full Form 5500 plan database to look up any individual plan by name, sponsor, or state. Browse all plans

Retirement Plans by State

See how retirement plans in this ranking break down geographically. Each state page shows plan counts, participants, and total assets for that jurisdiction.

Browse by Plan Type

Filter the retirement universe by plan structure, each type has distinct contribution rules, vesting schedules, and asset profiles.

Source: Department of Labor, Form 5500 Annual Return/Report. Rankings rebuilt from the publicly released 2024 plan-year file.

Source: DOL EFAST2 filing system (efast.dol.gov) - original Form 5500 filings retrievable by plan sponsor EIN or plan name.

Data sourced from U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA). See our methodology for details.

How Plan Rankings Are Constructed

Ranking retirement plans is more subtle than ranking, say, restaurants or stocks. A "largest" plan is unambiguous when measured by participant count or asset total, both are reported in Form 5500 and audited by an independent accountant once a plan crosses the 100-participant threshold. But a "best" plan is contextual: the right benchmark for a multi-employer pension fund is different from the right benchmark for a single-employer 401(k), and both are different from the benchmark for an ESOP. PlainRetire's ranking pages stick to clearly defined, source-derived metrics, participant counts, plan assets, net contribution, employer contribution as a share of pay, and year-over-year asset growth. Each metric has its own page so readers can decide which framing is relevant for their question.

Each ranking includes the underlying source (Form 5500 schedule and line item), the plan-year vintage, and a footnote when an aggregate excludes plans with incomplete or amended filings. Where a plan has filed multiple amendments, a sometimes-routine but sometimes-meaningful signal, the ranking uses the most recent accepted filing and notes the amendment count on the plan detail page. This approach lets readers see who is at the top of a particular ladder without conflating different scales of "size" or "growth."

Methodology and Limitations

Rankings are computed against the most recent annual dataset released by the Department of Labor. New plans, terminations, and significant amendments will not appear until the next annual release, which has roughly a seven-month publication lag from plan year end. Plans that file Form 5500-EZ (single-participant plans) are not included in the public datasets and therefore do not appear in PlainRetire rankings. International plans, government plans, and church plans (which are exempt from Title I of ERISA) are similarly outside the dataset and outside these rankings. When evaluating a ranking, consider the universe being compared: a national ranking of 401(k) sponsors will be dominated by Fortune 500 employers, while a state-level ranking will surface regionally significant plans that don't appear in the national list.

Asset and participant counts are reported by the plan sponsor and certified by an auditor for plans above 100 participants. Smaller plans rely on plan-sponsor attestation. Both are subject to standard data-quality caveats: corrections appear as amended filings in subsequent years, and PlainRetire reflects amendments as soon as DOL releases updated datasets.

Every figure on PlainRetire is rendered directly from the Department of Labor's Form 5500 annual return filings, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-25.