State retirement profile · Form 5500

Retirement Plans in Ohio

Employer-sponsored 401(k), pension, and other retirement plans headquartered in Ohio, drawn from DOL Form 5500 filings (plan year 2023).

5,225
Plans
$433.9B
Total assets
#8
By assets

The state in one line

Ohio hosts 5,225 employer-sponsored retirement plans holding $433.9B for 3,932,014 participants, the 8th-largest state by plan assets.

$433.9B
total plan assets
5,225
employer plans
$110,351
avg assets per participant
80%
of plans are 401(k)s
Total Plans
5,225
401(k) Plans
4,176
Participants
3,932,014
Total Assets
$433.9B

What the Form 5500 Data Shows for Ohio

Ohio: 5,225 employer-sponsored plans (4,176 401(k)), $433.9B aggregate assets, 3,932,014 participants. Average plan: $83M; largest is Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust & Employee Stock Ownership Plan at $23.1B. DOL Form 5500 methodology + HQ-vs-residence caveats →

A state total like this counts every plan whose sponsor lists a headquarters address in the state on its Form 5500 filing, so the figure reflects where employers are based rather than where their workers live or where the money is ultimately invested. A handful of very large sponsors — a national retailer, a bank, a multi-employer union fund — can dominate a single state's asset total, which is why the average plan size and the largest-plan name matter as much as the headline number. Smaller plans, those with fewer than one hundred participants, file a simplified schedule and are exempt from independent audit, so part of any state total rests on sponsor attestation rather than auditor confirmation. Treat these aggregates as a structural picture of the state's private retirement economy, not as a measure of any single worker's benefit or account.

Largest Plans in Ohio

# Plan Name Type Participants Total Assets
1 Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust & Employee Stock Ownership Plan 401(k) 32,152 $23.1B
2 GE Retirement Savings Plan 401(k) 59,766 $19.5B
3 The Sherwin-Williams Company 401(k) Plan ESOP 47,362 $10.1B
4 The Progressive 401(k) Plan 401(k) 56,176 $9.2B
5 The Kroger Co. 401(k) Retirement Savings Account Plan 401(k) 129,769 $8.4B
6 Nationwide Savings Plan Profit Sharing 24,715 $7.6B
7 Marathon Petroleum Thrift Plan 401(k) 17,818 $7.5B
8 Cleveland Clinic Savings and Investment Plan Profit Sharing 54,690 $7.5B
9 Eaton Savings Plan 401(k) 22,975 $7.3B
10 Parker Retirement Savings Plan 401(k) 25,764 $7.2B
11 Firstenergy Corp. Master Pension Plan Defined Benefit (Pension) 12,304 $7.1B
12 Nestle 401(k) Savings Plan 401(k) 31,854 $6.8B
13 Eaton Savings Plan 401(k) 26,555 $6.7B
14 Nationwide Retirement Plan Defined Benefit (Pension) 22,311 $5.3B
15 Aep Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan 401(k) 17,291 $5.2B
16 The Procter & Gamble Savings Plan Profit Sharing 28,627 $5.1B
17 American Electric Power System Retirement Plan Defined Benefit (Pension) 15,595 $4.5B
18 Cardinal Health 401(k) Savings Plan 401(k) 30,598 $4.3B
19 Macys Inc 401(k) Retirement Investment Plan 401(k) 120,254 $4.3B
20 Keycorp 401(k) Savings Plan 401(k) 19,118 $3.7B
21 Firstenergy Corp. Savings Plan 401(k) 12,114 $3.7B
22 Parker Defined Benefit Plan Defined Benefit (Pension) 191 $3.7B
23 Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Plan Other 10,029 $3.6B
24 Fifth Third Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan 401(k) 19,559 $3.6B
25 Cintas Partners' Plan 401(k) 47,138 $3.5B

Nearby States by Retirement Plan Footprint

States ranked adjacent to Ohio by total retirement plan assets.

Compare Ohio side-by-side with 3 peer states →

Frequently Asked Questions

How many retirement plans are in Ohio? ▼
Ohio has 5,225 employer-sponsored retirement plans as reported in 2023 DOL Form 5500 filings, including 4,176 401(k) plans.
What are the total retirement plan assets in Ohio? ▼
Retirement plans in Ohio hold $433.9B in total assets, covering 3,932,014 participants. The average plan holds $83M in assets.
What is the largest retirement plan in Ohio? ▼
The largest retirement plan in Ohio is Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust & Employee Stock Ownership Plan with $23.1B in total assets and 32,152 participants.
How does Ohio compare to other states for retirement plans? ▼
You can compare Ohio's retirement plan statistics against all 50 states on the States page. Rankings are based on total assets, plan count, and participant coverage from DOL Form 5500 data.

Guides

Explore PlainRetire

All States

Compare all 50 states
Largest Plans

Top plans by assets
By Industry

Plans grouped by sector
Guides

Understanding Form 5500

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA Form 5500 public disclosure dataset. Shows the top 25 plans headquartered in Ohio from the 5,000 largest plans nationally. Plan year 2023.

Source: DOL EFAST2 filing system (efast.dol.gov) — state is the plan sponsor's headquarters state as recorded on the Form 5500 filing.

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA). See our methodology for details.

Why Form 5500 Data Matters for Retirement Planning

Form 5500 is the annual return that virtually every private-sector retirement plan in the United States files with the Department of Labor. The filing covers funding, participant counts, plan investments, fees, service providers, and corrective contributions. Because the data is collected for regulatory oversight rather than marketing, it is one of the most consistent windows into the retirement economy: the same questions are asked of plans across all industries and all states, year after year. That consistency makes it possible to compare plans, sponsors, and markets on equal footing — a kind of comparability that voluntary survey data and vendor brochures cannot provide.

PlainRetire reorganizes the Form 5500 universe so a participant, employer, or analyst can ask everyday questions of the dataset without reading thousands of pages of agency documentation. Browsing by state surfaces concentration patterns: where pension assets sit, which states host the largest 401(k) sponsors, where retirement coverage trails the national average. Browsing by industry reveals the structural difference between sectors that historically relied on defined-benefit pensions and sectors that adopted defined-contribution plans early. Browsing by plan size highlights both the largest sponsors — typically Fortune 500 employers and multi-employer Taft–Hartley funds — and the long tail of small plans that collectively cover millions of workers.

What This Hub Page Aggregates

Each hub page on PlainRetire is a navigable index into the underlying database. The page shows summary counts, the most recent Form 5500 vintage, and direct links to individual plan detail pages. Detail pages carry the canonical filings, schedules where applicable, and audit trail back to the DOL's EFAST2 disclosure portal. Where the underlying dataset supports it, hub pages also expose key aggregates: total participant counts, aggregate assets, plan-type breakdowns (401(k), pension, profit-sharing, ESOP), and changes over the most recent reporting period.

Plan data is updated as DOL releases new annual Form 5500 datasets. Filings have a roughly seven-month lag from plan year end, so the most recent vintage typically reflects the previous full calendar year. This lag is inherent to the disclosure regime — plans are given time to gather audit reports and service-provider statements — and PlainRetire reflects the timing transparently rather than backfilling estimates.

Reading the Data With Appropriate Caveats

Aggregate numbers are useful for trend-spotting and structural comparison; they are less useful for decisions about a specific plan. The participant count for a state, for instance, includes both very large plans (which dominate the total) and very small plans (which influence median but not mean). When evaluating a specific employer's plan, drill into the plan detail page and consider plan-type, asset-mix, fee structure, and audit history — these details are flattened in any hub-level aggregate. Where regulatory updates change the categorization of a plan, PlainRetire preserves the historical filing alongside the most recent one so longitudinal analyses remain valid.