Other · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $16M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 103
- Participants Small participant base
- 74th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $159,195
- Avg per participant Above avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan · Sponsored by George Eastman Museum · New York · Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
$16M in assets, 103 participants
George Eastman Museum's George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan reported $16M in total assets and 103 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 74th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #2,578 in Arts, Entertainment & Recreation (3,077 peers)
Coverage in New York
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan covers 103 participants in New York, about 13% of the average New York filer (state average ~798 per filing). Assets: $16M.
- #2,578
- in Arts, Entertainment & Recreation (3,077 peers)
- -13.5%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $3M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan's outsized position by total assets
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$16,397,071 Top 26% higher than 74% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (103 participants).
EBSA filing schedule strip
Filing strip 160743991 · George Eastman Museum PY 2022 · Other
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan · $16M · 103 · 74th
- NET $16M
- BOOK 103
- VS-ST 74th
- BOY Other
- SCH near Oslc & Odi 403b Plan
- EBSA ind #2578
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Arts, Entertainment & Recreation retirement plans → · Plans in New York →
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
New York filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $19M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $16M |
| Net Income | -$3M |
| Employer EIN | 160743991 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1976-01-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (George Eastman Museum)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All George Eastman Museum plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $18M 11.584538482513127% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 103 | $16M |
| 2023 | 1 | 107 | $18M |
| 2024 | 1 | 90 | $18M |
Nearby Other Plans in New York
Peer Other plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Northwell Health 403(b) Plan $8.3B · 47,348
- The Mount Sinai Medical Center 403(b) Retirement Plan $7.3B · 30,163
- University of Rochester Retirement Program $6.4B · 27,581
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Retirement Savings Plan $4.6B · 21,395
- Retirement Plan for Officers of Columbia University $4.4B · 14,287
George Eastman Museum Retirement Plan's out-of-state Other peers by assets and headcount
Outside New York, the nearest Other by assets is Oslc & Odi 403b Plan in OR ($16M); by covered participants it is Food & Water Watch 403(b) Retirement Plan in DC (103 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($16M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (103 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.