401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2022
Allegis Corporation 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $16M
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 126
- Participants Small participant base
- 74th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $128,428
- Avg per participant Near avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Allegis Corporation · Minnesota · Wholesale Trade
$16M in assets, 126 participants
Allegis Corporation's Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan reported $16M in total assets and 126 participants in its 2022 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 74th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #4,795 in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
Coverage in Minnesota
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan covers 126 participants in Minnesota, about 11% of the average Minnesota filer (state average ~1,126 per filing). Assets: $16M.
- #4,795
- in Wholesale Trade (6,843 peers)
- -18.6%
- assets change YoY
The plan reported a net loss of $4M for the year, a single-year figure driven by markets and benefit payments, not a measure of plan health.
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan's outsized position by total assets
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2022 · DOL Form 5500
$16,181,959 Top 26% higher than 74% of 139,123 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2022
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan among mid-size filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2022 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan sits mid-pack in the medium band (126 participants).
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 410954593 · Allegis Corporation PY 2022 · 401(k)
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan · $16M · 126 · 74th
- TYPE $16M
- TYPE 126
- TYPE 74th
- TYPE 401(k)
- TYPE near Applied Computing Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust
- TYPE ind #4795
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Wholesale Trade retirement plans → · Plans in Minnesota →
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Minnesota filing particulars
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $20M |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $16M |
| Net Income | -$4M |
| Employer EIN | 410954593 |
| Plan Effective Date | 1992-09-01 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Allegis Corporation)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Allegis Corporation plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $20M 22.725375833667606% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 126 | $16M |
| 2023 | 1 | 138 | $19M |
| 2024 | 1 | 141 | $20M |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Minnesota
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Unitedhealth Group 401(k) Savings Plan $18.6B · 176,886
- Medtronic Savings and Investment Plan (Also Known as the Medtronic 401(k) Plan) $12.2B · 38,825
- Target Corporation 401(k) Plan $11.2B · 400,422
- 3M Voluntary Investment Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan $11.1B · 37,159
- U.S. Bank 401(k) Savings Plan $8.3B · 67,646
Allegis Corporation Retirement Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Minnesota, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Applied Computing Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust in VA ($16M); by covered participants it is Texas Citizens Bank, N. a. 401(k) Plan in TX (126 participants). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($16M here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (126 participants); asset peers above are excluded.
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2022. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.