401(k) · DOL Form 5500 · 2023
Atwater Paving Inc 401(k) Plan
Data updated 2026-08-25
- $69K
- Total assets Small plan by assets
- 1
- Participants Small participant base
- 5th
- Percentile by assets National rank
- $68,963
- Avg per participant Below avg balance/head
Official DOL plan name: Atwater Paving Retirement Plan · Sponsored by Atwater Paving Inc · Connecticut · Construction
$69K in assets, 1 participants
Atwater Paving Inc's Atwater Paving Retirement Plan reported $69K in total assets and 1 participant in its 2023 DOL Form 5500 filing, ranking in the 5th percentile by assets among filed plans. Figures are as reported by the plan sponsor to the Department of Labor, not audited or endorsed by PlainRetire.
- #368 in Construction (9,030 peers)
What the 2023 filing shows
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan holds $69K for 1 participant - about $68,963 per participant, among the smaller plans by assets on file.
- #368
- in Construction (9,030 peers)
- +0.1%
- assets growth YoY
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan among the smaller filed plans by assets
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan vs every filed plan by assets
End-of-year total assets · plan year 2023 · DOL Form 5500
$68,963 5th percentile higher than 5% of 127,068 filed plans
Dashed line + filled bar = this entry, among filed plans.
Source U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings (EBSA) · plan year 2023
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan among micro filed plans by headcount
Plan-year 2023 Form 5500 filings with a reported participant count, partitioned by headcount band, not by assets. Atwater Paving Retirement Plan is a micro filing (1 participant), the leftmost band.
What changed between DOL Form 5500 filings
plan year 2022 → plan year 2023
- Atwater Paving Retirement Plan reported net income rose from $31 in the plan year 2022 filing to $39 in the plan year 2023 filing.
DOL schedule card
Filing strip 824527138 · Atwater Paving Inc PY 2023 · 401(k)
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan · $69K · 1 · 5th
- EBSA $69K
- PART 1
- TYPE 5th
- NET 401(k)
- BOOK near Cgg Group Services, Inc. 401(k) Plan
- VS-ST ind #368
Stamps derive from this plan's Form 5500 line items (assets, participants, type, EIN, cohort placement) - not a quality rating of the sponsor. Read with Construction retirement plans → · Plans in Connecticut →
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan in the asset neighbourhood
Filing particulars (2023)
| Total Assets (Beginning of Year) | $69K |
|---|---|
| Net Assets (End of Year) | $69K |
| Net Income | $39 |
| Employer EIN | 824527138 |
| Plan Effective Date | 2018-03-05 |
| Filing Status | FILING RECEIVED |
Sponsor Plan History (Atwater Paving Inc)
Sponsor-wide plan assets over time
All Atwater Paving Inc plans reported in each filing year
- Latest sponsor-wide plan assets
- $69K 0.07834716499332599% vs 2022
- 2024 filing year
| Year | Plans | Participants | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $69K |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $69K |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | $69K |
Nearby 401(k) Plans in Connecticut
Peer 401(k) plans, same state, same plan type, ranked by total assets.
- Rtx Savings Plan $52.8B · 123,037
- Citi Retirement Savings Plan $20.7B · 77,865
- The Hartford Investment and Savings Plan $6.5B · 18,377
- Xerox Corporation Savings Plan $3.9B · 10,291
- Eversource 401(k) Plan $3.8B · 9,504
Atwater Paving Retirement Plan's out-of-state 401(k) peers by assets and headcount
Outside Connecticut, the nearest 401(k) by assets is Cgg Group Services, Inc. 401(k) Plan in WA ($69K); by covered participants it is Beandel, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan in UT (1 participant). Same-state nearby plans are listed separately above.
Closest by plan assets
Nearest other-state filings by tot_assets_eoy ($69K here).
Similar participant headcount
Nearest other-state filings by covered participants (1 participant); asset peers above are excluded.
- Beandel, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (UT) 1 · 0 off
- Goldsugar Foodservice, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (IL) 1 · 0 off
- Armo 401(k) Trust (NJ) 1 · 0 off
- Provencio Enterprises Retirement Plan (TX) 1 · 0 off
DOL Form 5500 plan year 2023. Asset totals can differ widely at the same headcount; neither axis is a quality rating.